Written by John VanDerLaan
In December 2023, the USGA and R&A (the American and European governing bodies for the game of golf) officially announced their latest attempt at changing the rules of the game based on their Distance Insights project.
This announcement comes in the form of a “decision” instead of a mere “proposal” and in plain English means a universal “rollback” of the golf ball for all players of the game, worldwide.
This has been a massively-discussed topic, both leading up to the announcement of this decision as well as in the days and weeks after the announcements. I am going to break down for you the highlights (and lowlights) of the proposals, their history, and the comments provided by the various governing bodies, tours, and major superstars in a direct and digestible form.
What is the golf ball rollback ?
The “rollback” means the best golf balls on the market will no longer fly as far. There are many golf balls on the market that are already “dead balls” but the most popular and highest-rated balls, such as the TP5, ProV1, Chrome Soft, and similar high-end models will all need to be re-engineered to meet new standards for reduced flight.
The way this is being enforced is by changing the testing protocols for golf ball. Currently, the rule is that a golf ball hit by a robot at 120mph swing speed, 2520 rpm, and 10 degree launch angle cannot travel more than 317 yards on average. The new rule is simply an adjustment to these standards: 125mph, 2220 rpm, and 11 degrees of launch can only produce a 317 yard shot.
That’s it, that’s the entire technical aspect of the “rollback” - which is actually a change in testing standards, that will require the top golf balls on the market to release what are essentially “limited flight” versions of their current products.
When does the rollback take effect?
The USGA and R&A are scheduled to implement the new rules for professionals in January 2028, and in January 2030 for all golfers.
I have information from a very reliable source that the PGA Tour will not adopt adopt the golf ball rollback decision.
What is the Distance Insights project?
The Distance Insights project is an ongoing joint effort by the USGA and R&A to “protect the game.” They have conducted some long analytical studies on swing speeds, course lengths, and driving distances of elite and amateur players and have concluded that driving distance is an existential threat to the game of golf as we know it.
From there, many actions have been conjured up in order to “combat” this threat and “preserve the future of the game.”
The first was a model local rule limiting the length of the driver to 46 inches for professional competitions, while leaving the general rule for all golfers unchanged at a 48-inch maximum.
This “model local rule” situation is a round-about way of effectively introducing bifurcation, without technically introducing bifurcation.
What is bifurcation?
“Bifurcation” is the trendy “million dollar word” of the last few years when it comes to this entire debate. It literally just means: a different set of rules for pros and amateurs. The easiest parallel would be MLB players using wooden bats, while NCAA and all other levels use metal.
This has been extremely strongly resisted in the golf space, for various reasons, but mostly to do with the long-standing tradition of all golfers being able to use the same clubs, balls, and play the same courses as the top professionals, if they so choose. It is something that is fairly unique to golf, and allows, in theory, amateur players to give themselves a one-to-one comparison to the top superstars. While the 46” driver rule is already effectively bifurcation, most of the debate about bifurcation has centered around the March 2023 “proposal” of a model local rule that aimed to limit golf balls for pros, but not for amateurs.
The “rejected” bifurcation proposal
In March 2023, the USGA and R&A made a joint announcement - this time in the form of a proposal - to introduce a model local rule basically along the same lines as the currently-scheduled universal rule that rolls back the golf ball.
This proposal wasn’t really subject to any kind of formal review, but there was nearly-universal pushback, perhaps most notably from the PGA Tour itself. PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan is quoted in a memo in response to the proposal saying:
“Although there has been some level of support for limiting future increases, there is widespread and significant belief the proposed Modified Local Rule is not warranted and is not in the best interest of the game.”
For some reason, this near-universal pushback from the professionals resulted in the USGA and R&A “fixing” their proposal by … extending the exact same rule that the professionals did not want … to all golfers … instead … 😬
Is this really a done deal?
If you ask Jon Rahm, “I think no matter our view, it looks like it’s happening. (...) The USGA and the R&A are going to do what they want to do, no matter what.”In response to the December 2023 decision, the PGA Tour largely mimicked its previous statement, while acknowledging that the governing bodies did incorporate some of their feedback … it was far from an endorsement of the rollback. “We believe the proposed increase in test clubhead speed to 125 mph is disproportional to the rate of increase we see when analyzing PGA TOUR radar data.” And “we will continue to share our feedback with the USGA and The R&A.” - Jay Monahan, December 2023
In theory, there is room for the PGA Tour to refuse to adopt this change. While that would be an unprecedented disassociation from the world governing bodies, it seems even more likely that the LIV Golf League could adopt their own policy, as well. Regardless of who “blinks” first, one league’s actions could certainly bolster the other to follow suit.
If this happened, technically only the US Open and the Open Championship would be directly subject to the USGA and R&A ruling, at least as far as major professional tournaments go. It also seems unlikely that they would stand their ground in this scenario and force “special” golf balls to be used by pros in only these two events each year, but everything about a potential refusal would be uncharted waters, so we can only speculate.
On paper, it’s a done deal. In reality, especially in the radical golf landscape that has emerged over the past two years, there are a LOT of wildcards that could be played by the various major parties, and all kinds of fragmented outcomes could play out until some agreement is finally settled upon.
Who are the power players in favor of a rollback, and why?
This is far from a comprehensive list, but there is a VERY influential MINORITY of individuals and organizations in favor of a rollback: The USGA, the R&A, Tiger Woods, and Rory McIlroy are the highlights.
Tiger Woods is often cited as one of the most outspoken proponents of a golf ball roll back, and has specifically lobbied for bifurcation in the form of pros playing a different ball than amateurs.
“We just don’t have enough property anymore.” - Tiger Woods
Rory McIlroy also has endorsed the bifurcation proposal:“In reality, the game is already bifurcated. You think we play the same stuff you do?” - Rory McIlroy
Rory contends that basically greedy equipment manufacturers manipulated the rule to apply to (and thereby hurt) all golfers, instead of just pros, in order to protect their bottom line.
In the same breath however, Rory says that the rollback “will make no difference whatsoever to the average golfer.”
Ultimately, Rory’s comments, like his comments on many subjects, feel completely out of touch. His dismissal that “I don’t believe an average golfer giving up 5-10 yards off the tee is going to have a material effect on their actual score, handicap or enjoyment of the game” gives off very much a “let them eat cake” vibe.
Rory McIlroy is pretty much the longest TOUR pro on the planet, and also arguably the best long-iron player of this generation, so he materially stands to have an even bigger advantage with these rule changes. It seems that he might actually be the selfish one, here … and yet is the one calling others greedy.
For your average golfer, ten yards off of the tee on every single hole is a full extra club for golfers who have that level of swing speed. This means most golfers will have to move up a set of tees in order to enjoy the game in the same way that they did before, and also pace of play will become even more of an issue than it already is for those who wish to play their current tees, which is arguably a much larger “existential threat” to the game for the 99.99% of golfers who are not male tour pros.
For years now, the USGA has been telling amateurs to “play it forward” but in the same breath they are now telling us that the ball is going too far?
The reality is that the ball goes “too far” for an extreme minority of male TOUR pros, only. Also the reality is that there are only a small handful of relevant courses and events - again only for elite male TOUR pros - that are threatened as “unplayable” due to distance gains.
Rory and Tiger point fingers at equipment manufacturers for insisting this rule apply to everyone, and not just elite pros, but the real story is not that they don’t want bifurcation, it’s that they don’t want any change at all for the most part, and are objected to bifurcation AND a universal roll back, and this is completely glossed over by their finger-pointing.
What are the USGA and R&A’s reasons for the rollback?
The governing bodies have concluded, based on their multi-year studies, that the golf ball goes too far and they have created a projection that it will continue to go farther and farther, with no ceiling in sight, so they have to not only draw a line in the sand, but actually go BACK and draw a line in the sand from the past, in order to protect the future, according to them.
The “problem” with the ball going “too far” is basically two-fold:1) Environmental concerns with courses being lengthened and needing more maintenance and watering2) Some courses being rendered “unplayable” for elite touring professionalsThe environmental concerns are a very catchy justification for any cause these days, but most tee box expansions do not include extended fairways - they are just little postage stamps of playing surface tucked away for players who are going to easily carry all the other tee boxes on their way to reaching the pre-existing fairway.
In addition, we are barely scratching the surface of new ways for engineers and architects to reduce water usage and reclaim water on golf courses, which is a much better area to press for innovation than actually changing the rules of the game.
As far as protecting courses - this may be unpopular but at this point in time it seems to be almost exclusively a European issue. And it is definitely true - there are a lot of “old world” courses in Europe that are no longer able to host elite TOUR events because they have been completely outgrown, and there is no way to expand the properties. However all of these courses are still a complete delight for recreational golfers, and you don’t need thousands or even hundreds of tour-level course setups in each continent, you really just need a handful to a few dozen.
It’s hard letting go - but to use the baseball parallel again … we no longer play at the Polo Grounds, Ebbets Field, or old Yankee Stadium … and the dimensions of many “classic” parks have been modified many times over the years … and everyone is just fine, and the game is still fully stoked with tradition.
Who is against the golf ball rollback, and why?
Mike Whan, USGA CEO, was quoted in their announcement as saying “while thousands will claim that we did too much, there will be just as many who said we didn’t do enough to protect the game long-term.”There doesn’t actually seem to be any evidence for this statement, as it's hard to find the thousands saying they aren’t doing enough, and there certainly seems to be a landslide of commenters saying the change is completely unnecessary or over-done.
In March 2023, Acushnet (Titleist’s parent company) CEO David Maher pointed out that the USGA and R&A’s rollback efforts seem to be “a solution in search of a problem.”
Justin Thomas echoed this exact sentiment in 2023, saying "You're trying to create a solution for a problem that doesn't exist. To me, it's just so bad for the game of golf.”
Meanwhile the PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan immediately sent a memo to players on December 6, 2023 stating unequivocally that they “do not support today’s announcement” and reiterated that their data does not agree with the data used by the Distance Insights project of the USGA and R&A.
The PGA of America released an immediate response to the new ruling:“We remain opposed to any change that may potentially lessen the enjoyment of the game for recreational golfers (...) It appears recreational golfers will see a greater reduction in distance than we would advise (...) At this time, we continue to have concerns.”
Bryson Dechambeau, when asked for comment in March, echoed the sentiments of the PGA Tour that the distance “problem” can still be adequately addressed through course setups, “I still think there’s more to go on designing golf courses than designers think right now.”
And Scottie Scheffler added to the rare chorus of unified LIV and PGA Tour voices in saying “Look at The Players; guys can't overpower that one. It's more of a golf course design thing than it is a golf ball deal.”
Rickie Fowler was quoted as saying “Looking at it as far as the game and everyone talks about growing the game, I think it's going to be a huge step back. ”And perhaps most ferociously, Keegan Bradley didn’t pull any punches when he said “For the amateur world to hit the ball shorter is monstrous (...) I can’t think of anything more stupid than that.”
What will be the actual effect on the pro game?
The USGA data has specifically laid out that the longest TOUR pros will lose about 15 yards off of their drives.